Atlas Shrugged

by

Ayn Rand

Atlas Shrugged: Part 2, Chapter 7 Summary & Analysis

Summary
Analysis
Eddie Willers sits in the Taggart cafeteria across from the unnamed worker and unburdens himself about the railroad’s growing collapse. He reveals that Dagny has resigned, though the public has been told she is on extended leave. Eddie explains that Clifton Locey, a political appointee loyal to James, has been placed in charge. Locey lacks competence, avoids all decision-making, and has begun unraveling everything Dagny built. Eddie recounts how Locey foolishly reassigned a vital emergency diesel locomotive at Winston Station to another bureaucrat’s private train, undermining a safeguard Dagny had personally established.
Eddie Willers’s candid disclosures to the quiet worker illustrate his emotional burden as he watches Taggart Transcontinental unravel under political incompetence. Eddie’s frustration embodies the helplessness of honest, competent workers forced to watch mediocrity destroy their achievements. Clifton Locey’s ineptitude symbolizes a broader systemic decay, reflecting Ayn Rand’s criticism of collectivist bureaucracy that prioritizes political connections over competence.
Themes
The Individual vs. the Collective Theme Icon
Government Power and Corruption Theme Icon
Despair in the Absence of Purpose Theme Icon
Eddie also shares rumors about Ragnar Danneskjöld destroying a steel mill that tried to produce Rearden Metal. He expresses a quiet hope that the pirate continues. Eddie also reveals that Dagny is hiding at her family’s lodge. In response, the worker, mentions that he always takes a month off every year—at his own expense—and that his break is coming up.
Eddie’s subdued admiration for Ragnar Danneskjöld’s actions signals his subconscious alignment with rebellion against systemic injustice. Eddie, typically a loyal and law-abiding person, finds himself quietly supporting someone he believes morally justified in resisting government oppression.
Themes
The Morality of Self-Interest Theme Icon
The Individual vs. the Collective Theme Icon
Meanwhile, Hank now lives alone in a Philadelphia apartment, having quietly left Lillian and the rest of his family. He has instructed his lawyer to secure a swift, uncompromising divorce, with no financial concessions to Lillian. He moves through life numbly, finding no pride in his achievements now that Rearden Metal is being used by people he despises.
Hank’s solitary life after abandoning Lillian and his family marks his rejection of obligations imposed by society. His emotional detachment and lack of pride in his work mirror his internal conflict: the metal he once viewed as a symbol of achievement now serves purposes antithetical to his values.
Themes
The Individual vs. the Collective Theme Icon
Government Power and Corruption Theme Icon
Despair in the Absence of Purpose Theme Icon
One evening, while walking back from his mills, Hank encounters a stranger who hands him a bar of gold. Hank initially recoils, believing he is being bribed or taunted. The man refuses to explain at first, only saying he is returning something that was taken unjustly. When pressed, he identifies himself as Ragnar Danneskjöld. Rearden is stunned. The man the world calls a criminal calmly tells him the gold is restitution—a portion of the income taxes Hank paid over 12 years, taken by force and now returned as a matter of justice.
Hank’s encounter with Ragnar Danneskjöld forces him to confront the stark reality of justice versus legality. Ragnar’s unexpected restitution symbolizes a concrete repudiation of Hank’s previous acceptance of societal guilt. Ragnar explicitly frames taxation as legalized theft, transforming the moral implications of Hank’s past compliance into tangible terms as wealth unjustly seized that is now rightfully returned.
Themes
The Morality of Self-Interest Theme Icon
The Individual vs. the Collective Theme Icon
Government Power and Corruption Theme Icon
Get the entire Atlas Shrugged LitChart as a printable PDF.
Atlas Shrugged PDF
Ragnar speaks without shame or apology. He declares that he lives by force, but openly and against those who live by theft. He explains that he intercepts government shipments meant for corrupt regimes and redistributes the value to men who earned it. He considers this not piracy but a moral crusade. Robin Hood, Ragnar says, was twisted into a symbol of institutionalized looting—glorifying need over merit. Ragnar sees himself as the antidote: he steals from the looters to return wealth to the productive.
Ragnar’s self-characterization as a moral crusader who reverses Robin Hood’s corrupted image directly challenges conventional moral beliefs. His defense of force as justified retaliation against institutional theft inverts traditional ethical narratives, presenting force not as aggression but as a necessary correction. His philosophy explicitly values merit and productivity, positioning him as a moral purist fighting against a corrupted society.
Themes
The Morality of Self-Interest Theme Icon
The Individual vs. the Collective Theme Icon
Government Power and Corruption Theme Icon
Ragnar insists that Hank keep the gold for himself—not for his business, but for the future. Ragnar has even established secret accounts at the Mulligan Bank, where capital is preserved for when the world collapses and must be rebuilt. Hank tries to argue, accusing Ragnar of acting like a charity worker. Ragnar refutes Hank’s condemnation, claiming that he serves ability, not need, and that he does so with full self-awareness.
The gold Ragnar offers to Hank symbolizes a promise of future restoration, recognizing Hank’s role in a larger struggle beyond immediate material concerns. Hank’s initial discomfort—viewing Ragnar’s action as charity—illustrates his struggle with accepting unearned gifts. Ragnar corrects Hank’s interpretation, clarifying that his mission serves productive individuals, not people in need.
Themes
The Morality of Self-Interest Theme Icon
The Value of Productive Work Theme Icon
The Individual vs. the Collective Theme Icon
When Hank challenges the logic of using criminal means to uphold moral ends, Ragnar insists that the state has already outlawed justice. He believes that virtue now survives only outside the law. He reveals that he destroyed Orren Boyle’s mill and vows to destroy any factory that tries to manufacture Rearden Metal under government orders. Hank resists, insisting he does not want Ragnar’s help and will report him. But then a police car approaches. Hank instinctively prepares to protect the pirate. When officers ask if he has seen a tall blond stranger, Hank lies. When they ask about Ragnar, who is still standing beside him, Hank calmly claims that Ragnar is his new bodyguard. The officers move on, satisfied. Ragnar nods in gratitude and disappears into the night. Hank, shaken but quiet, picks up the gold and continues his walk home.
When Hank confronts Ragnar about the contradiction of using criminal methods to enforce moral justice, Ragnar’s insistence that true morality lies outside current laws directly challenges Hank’s belief that what is lawful is necessarily moral. Hank’s instinctive decision to protect Ragnar from the police represents an unconscious alignment with Ragnar’s cause. His choice to lie, thus protecting the man society labels a criminal, signifies a profound shift toward accepting Ragnar’s moral framework over conventional legality.
Themes
The Morality of Self-Interest Theme Icon
The Value of Productive Work Theme Icon
The Individual vs. the Collective Theme Icon
The scene shifts to the Taggart Comet, where Kip Chalmers—an arrogant candidate for political office—is traveling to a rally in California. Alongside him are his campaign manager, his mistress, and a British academic. The train halts near the Taggart Tunnel in Colorado due to a failed engine. The crew explains that no replacement diesel is available, and the only option is an outdated coal-burning locomotive. Chalmers explodes with rage, threatening to destroy careers if the train is not moved immediately.
Kip Chalmers and his entourage embody the arrogance and entitlement Rand criticizes in political figures. Their presence on the Taggart Comet introduces immediate tension, exposing how political influence can override practical competence. Chalmers’s threatening behavior symbolizes the destructive impact of coercion and political pressure, which is sure to lead to disaster
Themes
Government Power and Corruption Theme Icon
Messages fly up the chain of command. Dave Mitchum, the division superintendent, is awakened. Mitchum, promoted through political favors rather than experience, is overwhelmed and paralyzed by the decision. Veteran railroad men refuse to advise him. Dagny’s predecessor had reserved the diesel meant for emergencies, but Locey ordered him to be reassigned, leaving them with only the dangerous coal engine.
Dave Mitchum’s paralysis and inability to make clear decisions illustrate the systemic rot within the Taggart hierarchy. His reliance on ambiguous language to evade accountability is typical of the political bureaucrats in the novel. Locey’s earlier reassignment of the emergency diesel engine exemplifies the reckless disregard for practical foresight, demonstrating the fatal consequences of political expediency over competent leadership.
Themes
Government Power and Corruption Theme Icon
The Corruption of Language Theme Icon
As Mitchum dithers, no one wants to take responsibility. Orders are vague, phrased to deflect blame. Locey tells Mitchum to move the Comet “without unnecessary delay,” while Mitchum tells his subordinates to use “the best available engine.” Everyone fears being held liable but continues pushing the train forward. When Bill Brent, the chief dispatcher, refuses to send the order, Mitchum punches him and hands the directive to a frightened young clerk who finally relays the command. The workers ready the coal-burning engine. The original engineer quits, unwilling to be part of it, and a drunken substitute is recruited. The road foreman warns that running a coal engine through the eight-mile tunnel risks suffocation. But fear of political consequences overrides every protest.
The chaotic preparation of the coal-burning engine demonstrates vividly the moral failure at all levels of Taggart Transcontinental. Bill Brent’s refusal to issue dangerous orders contrasts sharply with Mitchum’s cowardly violence, emphasizing the ethical split between integrity and self-preservation. The willingness of subordinates to proceed despite known dangers showcases Rand’s point that fear and political threats corrupt decision-making, forcing individuals to act against their rational judgment.
Themes
Government Power and Corruption Theme Icon
The train moves into the darkness of the tunnel. The engine sputters, and the fireman works furiously, but the smoke begins to build. The tunnel has no ventilation. One by one, the passengers lose consciousness. Chalmers had insisted that fear is the only practical tool for dealing with people, and now, no one on the Comet can escape the consequences of that belief. Every person aboard represents some form of looting morality: bureaucrats, professors, heirs, and parasites—each having supported the creed that ability must serve need. They suffocate in silence, unaware of the final irony. Far off in the distance, as the tunnel swallows them, the last thing they see is the glow of Wyatt’s Torch still burning against the night sky. Later, an unscheduled munitions train slams into the stalled Comet, and the explosion collapses the mountain, sealing the tunnel forever.
The tragic end of the Taggart Comet starkly symbolizes Rand’s ultimate moral judgment: those who live by coercion, exploitation, and political manipulation inevitably face self-destruction. Each passenger’s suffocation inside the tunnel metaphorically punishes them for advocating a system that sacrifices ability for need and reason for fear. The distant glow of Wyatt’s Torch, a symbol of rebellion and moral clarity, provides a powerful contrast to the collapsing tunnel, signifying that despite societal decay, the spirit of rationality and individualism continues to burn.
Themes
The Individual vs. the Collective Theme Icon
Government Power and Corruption Theme Icon