Previous
Part 1, Chapter 6
Themes
Key
LitCharts assigns a color and icon to each theme in Atlas Shrugged, which you can use to track the themes throughout the work.
The Morality of Self-Interest
The Value of Productive Work
The Individual vs. the Collective
Government Power and Corruption
The Corruption of Language
Despair in the Absence of Purpose
Summary
Analysis
Dagny travels to Colorado to meet Ellis Wyatt at his thriving oil fields. Wyatt eagerly gives her a tour, proudly showing off his new drilling methods and the rapid expansion of his operation. He stresses that his growing business urgently needs dependable rail service. Wyatt warns that if the Rio Norte Line isn’t completed on time, both his oil fields and the regional economy will collapse. Dagny understands how serious he is and. Energized by his determination, she feels even more urgency to finish the railroad—despite increasing political attacks on her use of Rearden Metal.
Wyatt’s oil fields stand as a vision of what is still possible—expansion, ingenuity, and purpose unshackled by politics. His clarity about consequences cuts through the bureaucratic fog of the world Dagny has left behind. His urgency is rooted in confidence that the world must respond to reality. Like Hank, Wyatt sees delay as a moral failure. Their alliance pushes Dagny beyond defense and into active resistance.
Themes
Troubled by the State Science Institute’s public condemnation of Rearden Metal, Dagny confronts Dr. Robert Stadler, the Institute’s highly respected leader. In his office, Stadler seems indifferent. He admits the metal is superior but claims that under political pressure, the truth no longer matters. Dagny challenges him, accusing the Institute of betraying its scientific purpose. Stadler responds bitterly. He says he cannot support Rearden Metal publicly because the Institute depends on government funding, and politicians demand simple, popular results—something the Institute has consistently failed to deliver.
Stadler’s defeat is quiet but absolute. Once a man of reason, he now recites the excuses of political compromise. His admission that truth no longer matters undercuts the very purpose of science. He becomes the intellectual version of James: someone who uses his prestige to evade responsibility. Dagny’s challenge to him is both personal and philosophical. She expects science to defend facts the same way Hank defends steel. Stadler’s failure to do so signals that even the defenders of truth have surrendered, choosing survival over integrity.
Themes
Stadler also explains that jealousy among his colleagues led to the Institute’s denunciation of Rearden Metal. He describes their motives as petty and political and says their behavior disgusts him—but he refuses to withdraw the statement. He ends the conversation by telling Dagny that society rejects reason and cares only about short-term gain and selfish convenience. Dagny walks out, disillusioned by Stadler’s choice to sacrifice scientific integrity for political safety.
Stadler’s inability to reverse the Institute’s statement confirms that institutions, once lost to compromise, cannot be reformed from within. His disgust with his colleagues doesn’t translate into action because he no longer believes action has power. Dagny leaves the meeting more convinced that she must operate outside existing systems.
Themes
Dagny tracks down James at their family estate along the Hudson River. He hides there, faking illness to avoid facing the crisis at Taggart Transcontinental. When she confronts him, he blames her for the company’s problems and claims that her push to use Rearden Metal cost them key political allies. James admits that he tried to convince government officials to seize Dan Conway’s successful railroad in Colorado, which directly competes with Taggart. The plan collapsed after influential businessmen, including Wyatt, refused to support such a corrupt scheme.
James hiding at the estate while chaos unfolds echoes the pattern of retreat seen across the novel. He blames Dagny for disrupting political alliances, but it’s clear he cannot function in a world where outcomes matter. His attempt to destroy Conway’s railroad reveals how far he’s willing to go to win without earning anything. That Wyatt and others refused to support his plan marks a rare moment of public resistance to corruption. James loses this round not because Dagny outmaneuvered him, but because the last remnants of integrity in the business world rejected him.
Themes
Get the entire Atlas Shrugged LitChart as a printable PDF.
Dagny rejects James’s excuses and gives him an ultimatum: she will leave Taggart Transcontinental temporarily and form her own company to finish the Rio Norte Line. She tells him she will take full financial and managerial responsibility, cutting off any public connection to Taggart. Once the line succeeds, she will hand it back to the company. James agrees but insists that if she fails or causes a scandal, she must resign permanently. When he asks what she plans to call the new venture, Dagny says “the John Galt Line.” She chooses the name on purpose—to confront the despair that has taken hold of the public. James recoils, calling the name unlucky and undignified, but Dagny refuses to back down.
Dagny’s decision to form her own company is a moral break as much as a strategic one. By severing her name from Taggart, she rejects the compromises James demands and reclaims personal accountability. Her choice of the name “John Galt Line” transforms a symbol of surrender into one of defiance. Whereas the public sees the name as unlucky, Dagny sees it as a dare to a culture afraid of failure and too timid to try. If the system cannot support progress, she will build outside the system.
Themes
Needing money for her independent project, Dagny reluctantly goes to Francisco. Their meeting feels tense—Francisco stays distant and uninterested. Dagny pleads with him openly, admitting she’s come to beg. She reminds him of their shared past and insists she has stayed loyal to the industrial values they once believed in. Bitterly, she offers herself up to his scorn, saying he could help her easily, even if just to mock her or treat it as charity.
The meeting with Francisco flips their earlier dynamic. Dagny arrives seeking support, and he withholds it—not out of cruelty, but as part of a larger, hidden purpose. Francisco’s emotional restraint frustrates her, but it hints at the scale of his vision. Francisco isn’t working for prestige or sentiment—he is waiting for something deeper to shift.
Themes
Francisco stays cold and turns Dagny down. But for a moment, Dagny sees something break through his mask—a flicker of pain and tenderness in his expression. He covers it quickly. Then he tells her, cryptically, to question her assumptions, hinting that she completely misunderstands what he is doing. He refuses to explain further. He walks away, and Dagny, confused and hurt, decides to press on without him.
Francisco’s cryptic refusal and fleeting expression of pain suggest that his distance is not emotional detachment, but moral commitment to something larger. He wants Dagny to let go of assumptions—not just about him, but about the world she’s still trying to fix.
Themes
Francisco’s refusal doesn’t stop Dagny. She quickly secures funding from a group of industrialists who believe in her mission. Wyatt, Ted Nielsen, Andrew Stockton, Lawrence Hammond, and Ken Danagger all invest heavily in the John Galt Line, risking their reputations and fortunes to support it. Hank steps forward too, offering a major investment. At first, Dagny hesitates—he has already taken a huge risk with Rearden Metal—but when Hank insists on splitting the financial burden as a full partner, she agrees.
The formation of the John Galt Line’s backers marks a new frontier of resistance. These people are not dreamers or philosophers; they are people who risk everything for the right to build. Hank’s insistence on joining reinforces the moral partnership forming between him and Dagny. Unlike James, these investors do not ask for guarantees or favors. Their commitment is a bet on competence—a kind of moral credit line extended to someone who has proven her value through action.
Themes
Meanwhile, Hank deals with a crisis at his steel mill. A freight train carrying crucial copper for Rearden Steel crashes in New Mexico. He responds immediately—he hires trucks, reroutes deliveries, and salvages the shipment without delay. Just as he resolves the emergency, he receives devastating news: Congress has passed the Equalization of Opportunity Bill. The new law targets successful businesses like his and forces them to hand over resources to weaker competitors. Hank reels from the blow, but he regains control quickly and resolves to keep working, no matter what the law demands.
Hank’s swift handling of the shipping disaster demonstrates the kind of leadership missing everywhere else in the novel. He doesn’t panic or complain; he acts. But the Equalization of Opportunity Bill lands as a direct attack on this mindset. The law punishes him not for failing, but for succeeding too well. His decision to continue working reflects a deeper ethic: the refusal to let injustice dictate behavior.
Themes
That same day, Mrs. Rearden shows up unannounced and demands that Hank give Philip a prestigious job at the steel mills. She insists that Philip needs it for his self-esteem, ignoring the fact that he cannot do the work. Hank refuses. He says that jobs should go to people who earn them. His mother lashes out, accusing him of being cold and selfish, and says he does not understand Philip’s emotional needs. Hank, stunned by her reasoning, rejects the request outright. He tells her that Philip will never work for him. She leaves furious and bitter.
The request from Mrs. Rearden for Philip’s employment further illustrates the novel’s central conflict: effort versus entitlement. Her reasoning—that Philip needs the job for emotional validation—is the same logic used to justify political redistribution. Hank’s refusal is firm because he sees the stakes clearly. To reward Philip would be to validate the belief that feelings outrank ability, a viewpoint he finds immoral.
Themes
Shortly after, Hank meets with Mr. Ward, the owner of Ward Harvester Company, who urgently asks for a shipment of steel. Ward explains that without it, his company will collapse—his workers will lose their jobs, and his customers will walk away. Hank listens. Moved by Ward’s desperation and honesty, he adjusts his packed production schedule to make sure Ward gets the steel he needs to keep his business alive.
Mr. Ward’s appeal shows the other side of business: when competence is met with integrity. Hank’s choice to adjust his schedule is not charity—it is respect. Similarly, Ward asks not for help, but for a transaction based on mutual need. Such a transaction is an example of what Rand calls “rational egoism,” where two parties work together not because they have a desire to help others, but because they want to help themselves. For Rand—and her heroic characters—this form of selfishness is a moral necessity.
Themes
Later, alone in his office, Hank feels drained and overwhelmed. The injustice of everything—laws, politics, his own family—weighs heavily on him, and for a moment, he sinks into despair. He feels trapped, watching the world try to destroy the work he built. But in the middle of that darkness, an idea hits him: a new way to design the bridge for Dagny’s railroad, which would be stronger and more efficient than anything he’s built before. Energized, he grabs a pencil and starts sketching.
Hank’s despair marks a threshold moment. The weight of the world’s absurdity begins to press in, not because he has failed, but because he is being punished for succeeding. Yet the arrival of the bridge design idea transforms that despair into creation. His shift from collapse to invention suggests that for people like Hank, the answer to pain is purpose.
Themes
Hank calls Dagny late that night and describes his new design with excitement. Over the phone, he brushes off the political setbacks and focuses entirely on the structure—explaining how it will be faster to build and stronger than anything else on the rails. Dagny hears the certainty in his voice and feels it spark her own resolve. Now more than ever, she commits to the John Galt Line. Before hanging up, Hank promises to send her the detailed plans within two days.
The phone call between Hank and Dagny confirms the power of their alliance. The excitement in Hank’s voice reignites Dagny’s resolve, showing how conviction can spread when shared by equals. Their bond is built entirely on clarity and work—no guilt, no sentiment, just purpose. In a world drifting toward helplessness, their certainty becomes a rare and stabilizing force.
Themes
