Previous
Part 2, Chapter 3
Themes
Key
LitCharts assigns a color and icon to each theme in Atlas Shrugged, which you can use to track the themes throughout the work.
The Morality of Self-Interest
The Value of Productive Work
The Individual vs. the Collective
Government Power and Corruption
The Corruption of Language
Despair in the Absence of Purpose
Summary
Analysis
At the Thanksgiving table, Hank sits silently as Lillian, Mrs. Rearden, and Philip praise the dinner and exchange shallow compliments. Lillian brings up Hank’s upcoming trial and accuses him of being arrogant and reckless. She urges him to cooperate with the authorities, arguing that people like Orren Boyle avoid trouble by playing along. Hank calmly refuses. Lillian calls his stance futile, claiming he acts out of pride rather than principle. She insists that questions of right and wrong are meaningless, that no one can ever truly know what is moral, and that Hank’s insistence on righteousness only serves to flaunt imagined superiority over others.
Hank’s silence at the Thanksgiving table marks a full psychological break from his family. While Lillian tries to provoke him with insinuations about pride and arrogance, he no longer feels the need to respond. Her claim that morality is unknowable is a deliberate tactic to dismantle any claim to integrity. She frames submission as common sense and cooperation as virtue, but her words betray the emptiness of a worldview that cannot define good or evil.
Themes
As Lillian continues, Hank listens without reacting. Lillian’s attempts to shame him fail because he does not feel guilty about his actions. Her only weapon has been his own integrity, and without that, she is powerless. For months, she has relied on his generosity to sustain her cruelty. Watching her smile as she serves dessert, he sees no trace of pain or conflict. He suspects her malice is conscious, but he cannot fully believe it. Out of some lingering pity, he chooses not to condemn her entirely.
Hank’s refusal to argue with Lillian shows how far he has come. He recognizes that her authority over him rested entirely on the presumption of guilt. Once that illusion is gone, her power dissolves. Her composure, her smile as she serves dessert, no longer holds any emotional sway. Hank feels no betrayal from her—only the confirmation that she never felt conflicted to begin with.
Themes
When Lillian returns to the topic of Hank’s trial, Mrs. Rearden pleads with him to avoid disgrace and protect the family. Hank refuses, saying he no longer cares. Philip interrupts with a calm, self-righteous speech, accusing Hank of profiteering and selfishness. Hank quietly tells him that if he repeats those words, he will be thrown out immediately. The family freezes in silence, shocked but unsurprised. His mother begs him to reconsider, calling him cruel. Hank claims his selfishness openly, unmoved by their pleas. Philip tries to act wounded, suggesting he might leave, but Hank cuts off every attempt at manipulation.
When Mrs. Rearden and Philip join the effort to shame him, Hank’s clarity cuts through their performance. He does not try to justify himself. He simply states that he no longer cares. This rejection leaves them with nothing to hold onto. Philip’s attack, couched in measured tones, presents altruism as moral superiority, but Hank’s response shatters the pretense. He no longer argues about ideals. Instead, he threatens immediate expulsion.
Themes
Philip fumbles through excuses, claiming he never meant offense, offering vague abstractions and self-pity. He suggests he could move to New York if he had financial help. Hank denies him immediately. Philip then says he stays only for Mrs. Rearden’s sake. Hank cuts him off again. Looking into Philip’s face, he sees only blank hatred—no shame, no emotion, no desire to understand. For a moment, Hank feels a wave of pity and almost asks what led his brother to fall so far. But he lets it pass. He realizes no one at the table will defend Philip, because none of them ever believed in the code they used to control him.
Philip’s retreat into self-pity fails to generate any sympathy. Every phrase he offers is a tactic—a half-formed lie or a manipulative gesture. Hank’s refusal to provide assistance, even when Philip frames it as care for their mother, shows that he finally sees the strategy for what it is. He is no longer tricked by the language of obligation. When he looks at Philip and feels only pity, he resists it. What he sees is a man who has given up the responsibility of thought, who uses moral language only as camouflage.
Themes
Get the entire Atlas Shrugged LitChart as a printable PDF.
Hank declares that he is leaving for New York. He then drives through the frozen darkness, leaving his family and their hollow rituals behind. Their appeals to duty and guilt no longer affect him. As the blur of passing towns fades behind the windshield, his thoughts drift to the “Wet Nurse,” the government-appointed boy who once tried to manipulate him. Hank recalls their recent encounters with curiosity and quiet pity—something in the boy has begun to shift. Though he had every opportunity to betray Hank, he chose not to. Hank does not understand the boy’s motives but recognizes in him the stirrings of conscience. He sees a contrast between the dead weight of his family and the potential that persists in unexpected places.
Leaving for New York becomes an act of liberation for Hank. The cold landscape and empty towns he passes visually represent the spiritual desolation he has left behind. Hank no longer hears the voices of guilt and duty. His thoughts shift to the Wet Nurse, whose presence has unexpectedly grown meaningful. This young man, once a tool of the state, now shows signs of independent thought. The fact that he has not betrayed Hank speaks volumes. Unlike Hank’s family, the boy has begun to question the system he was sent to enforce. The contrast reveals that redemption lies in honesty, not pedigree.
Themes
Hank remembers visiting the mills that morning, finding the Wet Nurse standing alone, watching the furnaces with unguarded fascination. The boy had confessed that he studied metallurgy and returned out of loneliness, hinting at a quiet admiration for Hank. Driving through small towns now stripped of energy and life, Hank feels the hopelessness of a nation in collapse. The radio reports another wreck on Taggart’s main line—another broken rail, another avoidable disaster. Dagny had fought to keep the line running with limited steel, denied the chance to use Rearden Metal because of government limitations. The metal that could have rebuilt the country lies unused, while the railroads disintegrate under political directives.
The Wet Nurse’s fascination with metallurgy and his quiet reappearance at the mills mark the beginning of a moral awakening. Hank sees in him a possible ally—not because of ideology, but because of an unspoken respect for precision, work, and truth. Their relationship remains tentative, but it reveals a truth Hank has only begun to understand: integrity can emerge in unlikely places. The world outside, however, continues to crumble. Dagny’s failure to access Rearden Metal, combined with another Taggart derailment, proves that systemic collapse is accelerating—not because of lack of resources, but because the government has deliberately withheld those resources.
Themes
Hank arrives in New York and goes straight to Dagny’s office, finding her still at work. In a gesture of solidarity and defiance, he tells her that she will receive Rearden Metal instead of steel for her rail order—60,000 tons replaced by 80,000 tons of his own metal, at the same price. He has orchestrated the switch in secret, shielding her from blame and ensuring the trail leads only to him. She tries not to thank him, but her gratitude and admiration show clearly. He insists it is not a favor but a necessity—his only way to endure the system that crushed Danagger. She promises to stay silent, and he warns her never to quit, even if he is sentenced the next day. Then, the two quietly celebrate Thanksgiving together in her office.
Hank’s gesture to Dagny is his statement of allegiance. He gives her 80,000 tons of Rearden Metal under her old steel contract, assuming full risk for the illegal switch. His insistence that it is not a favor, but a necessity, reveals that he now understands the power of silent defiance. He no longer plays by the rules or asks for protection. Their shared Thanksgiving in her office becomes a rejection of the world outside. Without fanfare or speeches, they reaffirm their commitment to each other and to the work that sustains their identity.
Themes
Later, at the courthouse, a crowd gathers not to witness justice, but to see the man who invented Rearden Metal. The courtroom is full, and the proceedings are broadcast live over the radio. The judges—appointed by Washington—begin the trial under the guise of law, but Hank refuses to acknowledge their legitimacy. He offers no defense. Denying any wrongdoing, he denounces the court’s authority to judge him. Calmly, he states that he will not assist in preserving the illusion of justice where none exists. The court demands his cooperation to maintain appearances, but Hank refuses to lend his sanction to their coercion. He accepts any punishment they choose to impose—jail, fines, force—but will not pretend it is lawful or moral.
Hank’s trial becomes a test not of legality but of meaning. The crowd that fills the courtroom is not there for justice—they are drawn to Hank himself. His insistence that the court has no moral right to judge him strikes at the foundation of the entire judicial spectacle. Hank does not plead for mercy or attempt to win favor. Instead, he challenges the very idea that law without principle deserves obedience. By stating openly that he will accept punishment but never lend his approval, he strips the court of the legitimacy it depends on to survive.
Themes
Hank’s defiant courtroom speech ends with a public declaration: he lives and works solely for his own profit and will never feel guilt for his ability, success, or wealth. The crowd erupts in unexpected applause. Some faces show joy and hope, others relief or admiration. The judges, shaken, try to reframe the trial as a misunderstanding, claiming they never meant to punish him. Hank rejects their pleas for cooperation and makes clear that no action they take will be voluntary on his part. They impose a $5,000 fine, retreating under the weight of public opinion and his unshakable stand. As Hank leaves, he sees the full extent of their weakness. He feels more than ever that the system is run by cowards posing as rulers.
The speech Hank delivers crystallizes the philosophical core of his transformation. He rejects guilt. He rejects obligation. He claims ownership over his talent, wealth, and labor without apology. When the crowd cheers, it reveals how starved the public has become for honesty. The judges, sensing the loss of control, try to reframe the trial as a misunderstanding. But Hank has taken away the one thing they need: his consent. The fine they impose is not a punishment but a retreat. The system has no force unless its victims pretend it is fair. Hank leaves knowing he has won something larger than acquittal.
Themes
Outside the courtroom, Hank is met by working-class strangers who plead with him not to give up. They understand who is really paying the price. But Hank knows their cheers are fleeting. The same people who cheer him today will accept new government decrees tomorrow, betraying their best instincts because they have been taught that virtue is guilt. He realizes that the deepest challenge he faces is not in politics or economics, but in discovering the basic idea that made people accept moral codes that demand their destruction. The real sentence he has received is the responsibility to uncover the source of that corruption.
The people who greet Hank outside are sincere, but their praise leaves him uneasy. He understands that their applause is not the same as understanding. These are the same people who will fold under pressure tomorrow: people who have never questioned underlying values of the moral code used to defeat them. Hank sees clearly that the battle is not against specific laws or officials, but against the hidden idea that to live for oneself is a crime. He now knows that until this idea is exposed, no reform or resistance can last.
Themes
Publicly, the media downplays the trial. Privately, other businessmen avoid Hank, resent him, or accuse him of extremism. They try to hold onto middle ground, claiming they still believe in profit but also support directives. Hank confronts their cowardice and evasions, refusing to compromise. He battles growing revulsion toward humanity. He longs to speak with Francisco, who has remained silent since the trial. One night, Hank gives in and visits Francisco’s suite. There, he finds Francisco alone, drafting blueprints on the floor. Hank senses Francisco was waiting for him too.
The aftermath of the trial proves that defiance isolates as much as it empowers. The media distorts the outcome, and fellow businessmen treat Hank like a dangerous radical. They attempt to hide behind diluted values—declaring vague support for capitalism while endorsing regulation. Hank sees their cowardice for what it is. They fear taking a stand because they fear losing approval. His longing to speak with Francisco grows not from weakness, but from the desire to speak honestly with someone who understands. When he finds Francisco drafting blueprints alone, he knows that connection is still possible.
Themes
Francisco greets him with warmth, hiding excitement beneath casual jokes. Hank presses him to finish their last interrupted conversation, but Francisco says it is still too soon. Instead, Hank confronts him about the contradiction between his brilliance and his reputation as a playboy. Francisco, smiling, explains that the contradiction is deliberate. A man’s sexual desire, he says, mirrors his values. It is not a cause but an effect. Hank listens, drawn in by the clarity of the argument. Francisco describes how only those with self-respect can love truly, while others use sex to escape their shame. Hank realizes he never accepted guilt for making money—and now begins to see that the same moral premise must apply to love.
Francisco’s demeanor is relaxed, but his joy at seeing Hank is real. His decision not to continue their last conversation shows discipline, not avoidance. Instead, he pivots to a different subject—sex and its relationship to morality. His explanation is radical but coherent: sexual desire reveals what a person values about themselves. Francisco argues that love, like wealth, is a consequence of virtue rather than a distraction from value. Hank listens closely, recognizing for the first time that he has never truly questioned the moral framework that separated love from pride. The boundaries are starting to dissolve.
Themes
Francisco admits that his reputation as a playboy was an intentional disguise, used to deflect attention from his true motives. He tells Hank that he never touched the women he was seen with and used their vanity and insecurities against them to ensure they never slept together. He wanted to be perceived as careless with money to mask his real activities. When Hank presses him for an explanation, Francisco only says he did it for a purpose he cannot yet reveal. However, he confesses that he has never loved anyone but one woman. In fact, he still loves this woman but has told no one—not even her. Hank can tell that this admission is genuine and brings Francisco a great deal of pain.
Francisco’s confession about the false persona he cultivated shows the lengths he went to in order to protect his true purpose. His manufactured reputation as a careless playboy was not an act of evasion but an act of strategy. He turned the world’s assumptions against it, hiding in plain sight. The revelation that he never slept with the women he paraded publicly shows how precise and deliberate his deception was. The pain in his voice when he admits that he still loves one woman—Dagny—cuts through his performance, though Hank does not know who he is talking about.
Themes
Hank, trusting him completely, reveals his plan to keep producing Rearden Metal illegally and says he has already ordered copper—secretly—from d’Anconia Copper. When Francisco hears the shipment date, he reacts with shock. He promises Hank that they are friends, regardless of what is about to happen. Days later, news spreads that Ragnar Danneskjöld has sunk three copper ships from San Juan. The copper is gone—but the deeper blow is Francisco’s apparent betrayal. Hank, filled with rage, tells himself he wants to kill Francisco.
Hank’s trust in Francisco becomes complete when he admits his plan to smuggle copper from d’Anconia Copper. But the reaction Francisco gives—visible shock—foreshadows betrayal. His final words, spoken with unusual intensity, are a warning. Hank does not yet understand what they mean. Days later, when Ragnar Danneskjöld sinks the copper ships, the betrayal feels absolute. Hank grows furious, thinking that the one person he trusted betrayed him.
Themes
