Throughout the essay, the primitive or “savage” man symbolizes humanity in its purest and most natural state, untainted by civilization’s influence. Rousseau depicts this figure as independent, self-sufficient, and living in harmony with nature. The primitive man represents the ideal of moral innocence and equality, untouched by the corrupting forces of property, ambition, or social hierarchies. Unlike modern humans, who are driven by competition and societal expectations, the primitive man possesses simple needs and desires, relying on instinct and necessity rather than artificial constructs. For Rousseau, the primitive man is not merely an archetype but a lens through which to critique contemporary society. This figure symbolizes the potential for human goodness when external pressures have yet to corrupt it. The primitive man’s existence highlights the stark contrast between the freedom of humanity’s natural state and the constraints of modern civilization. By idealizing the primitive man, Rousseau challenges the Enlightenment belief in progress and suggests that the development of society hasn’t improved humanity and has instead led to inequality and moral decline.
The Primitive or “Savage” Man Quotes in Discourse on the Origin of Inequality
Of all the branches of human knowledge, the most useful and the least advanced seems to me to be that of man; and I dare say that the inscription on the temple at Delphi alone contained a precept more important and more difficult than all the huge tomes of the moralists. Thus I regard the subject of this discourse as one of the most interesting questions that philosophy is capable of proposing, and unhappily for us, one of the thorniest that philosophers can attempt to resolve. For how can the source of the inequality among men be known unless one begins knowing men themselves? And how will man be successful in seeing himself as nature formed him, through all the changes that the succession of time and things must have produced in his original constitution […] ?
Since the savage man’s body is the only instrument he knows, he employs it for a variety of purposes that, for lack of practice, ours are incapable of serving. And our industry deprives us of the force and agility that necessity obliges him to acquire. If he had had an axe, would his wrists break such strong branches? If he had had a sling, would he throw a stone with so much force? […] Give a civilized man time to gather all of his machines around him, and undoubtedly he will easily overcome a savage man. But if you want to see an even more unequal fight, pit them against each other naked and disarmed, and you will soon realize the advantage of constantly having all of one’s forces at one’s disposal, of always being ready for any event, and of always carrying one’s entire self, as it were, with one.
Above all, let us not conclude with Hobbes that because man has no idea of goodness he is naturally evil […] we could say that savages are not evil precisely because they do not know what it is to be good; for it is neither the development of enlightenment nor the restraint imposed by the law, but the calm of the passions and the ignorance of vice which prevents them from doing evil. So much more profitable to these is the ignorance of vice than the knowledge of virtue is to those.
