Previous
Summary
Themes
Key
LitCharts assigns a color and icon to each theme in Discourse on the Origin of Inequality, which you can use to track the themes throughout the work.
Critique of the Enlightenment
Natural vs. Artificial Inequality
Morality and Self-Preservation
The Illusion of Progress
Summary
Analysis
Jean-Jacques Rousseau addresses the leaders and citizens of Geneva, Switzerland, expressing admiration for the Republic’s governance and social structure. He opens by explaining his desire to pay homage to his homeland, emphasizing his belief that only a virtuous citizen should present such acknowledgment to their country. Rousseau reflects on Geneva’s unique combination of equality and order, which he considers a rare achievement. He explains how this balance aligns with the natural law while also ensuring public order and individual happiness.
Rousseau’s letter to the Republic of Geneva establishes a foundation for the Discourse on the Origin of Inequality by grounding his philosophical arguments in a real-world Republic that he admires. His praise for Geneva is not merely an expression of personal affection; it is an example of how to achieve social harmony through a balance of equality and order. This idealization of Geneva reflects Rousseau’s broader belief that governance rooted in virtue and simplicity aligns with natural law, an essential concept that will underpin his later arguments about humanity’s fall from a state of nature.
Themes
Rousseau’s ideal state reflects the principles he sees embodied in Geneva. He values a republic where governance aligns with the natural abilities of its citizens. In such a republic, individuals assume personal responsibility for their roles rather than delegating tasks unnecessarily. Rousseau believes a close-knit community fosters accountability, allowing citizens to be well-acquainted with one another, ensuring that virtues receive public recognition, and preventing vice from remaining hidden. He values a sense of national identity rooted in love for one’s fellow citizens rather than attachment to the land itself.
In Rousseau’s vision of an ideal state, the relationship between governance and personal responsibility mirrors his philosophical commitment to the idea that individuals thrive in a close-knit community where their roles are clear and essential. Meanwhile, his emphasis on personal accountability and mutual recognition among citizens anticipates the Discourse’s exploration of the corrupting influence of artificial hierarchies.
Themes
Rousseau prefers a state where the interests of the sovereign and the people align completely. He believes that only a government structured as a democracy can achieve this unity. He criticizes systems where any individual or external authority stands above the laws, as such systems inevitably subject the entire population to the arbitrary will of the powerful.
By arguing that the sovereign (a supreme ruler, often a monarch) and the people must share the same interests, Rousseau illustrates the dangers of political systems where authority becomes detached from the collective will. The insistence on democratic principles and the rejection of arbitrary authority provides a direct prelude to the Discourse’s examination of how inequality emerges through the gradual erosion of collective power and the rise of self-interest among elites.
Themes
According to Rousseau, a republic’s longevity is critical to its success. He argues against new or unstable governments, which he believes often fail to adapt to the needs of their people or vice versa. He compares liberty to rich food or wine: it nourishes those accustomed to it but overwhelms those unprepared for it. He believes gradual acclimation to liberty and independence is essential for a nation to thrive. Rousseau favors a peaceful and ancient republic that has weathered challenges and emerged stronger, with citizens who value and sustain their freedom.
The metaphor of liberty as rich food or wine encapsulates Rousseau’s belief that freedom must be cultivated and maintained through gradual exposure, an idea that reinforces the importance of historical continuity in sustaining republican values. His preference for stable, long-standing republics like Geneva reflects his broader skepticism toward revolutionary change, which he views as disruptive and potentially dangerous.
Themes
Get the entire Discourse on the Origin of Inequality LitChart as a printable PDF.
Rousseau also prefers a republic that refrains from conquest and avoids becoming a target for others. He describes an ideal state situated in a region where its neighbors see no advantage in attacking it and may even intervene to preserve its independence. In such a state, citizens maintain a readiness for self-defense not out of necessity but to keep their spirit of liberty alive. Rousseau envisions a legislative system where citizens collectively determine the terms of their governance, yet he rejects unchecked populism. He believes magistrates should propose laws with careful deliberation, while citizens, in turn, should evaluate them with restraint. He stresses the importance of preserving longstanding laws, as frequent changes undermine their authority and respect.
Rousseau’s reflections on military restraint and self-defense align with his broader political philosophy, which champions the preservation of liberty through civic engagement rather than conquest. His ideal republic is one that secures its freedom internally, through the collective will of its citizens, rather than externally, through force or expansion. This vision foreshadows his critique of societies that equate power with territorial acquisition, a dynamic he sees as contributing to inequality and social fragmentation.
Themes
Rousseau warns against republics that reserve all civil and judicial powers for the people, arguing that this lack of structure leads to poor governance. Instead, he supports a system where citizens retain the power to sanction laws and decide significant matters while delegating administration to elected magistrates. He advocates for a separation of powers and an annual rotation of officials to ensure accountability and prevent corruption. In his view, a republic that fosters mutual respect between magistrates and citizens will maintain peace even during periods of conflict or misunderstanding.
By advocating for the delegation of administrative tasks to magistrates while preserving the people’s right to sanction laws, Rousseau envisions a society where governance remains responsive and transparent. This model of shared responsibility directly opposes the hierarchical structures that Rousseau will go on to critique in the Discourse, where he argues that inequality solidifies when power becomes monopolized by a select few.
Themes
Geneva, according to Rousseau, embodies many of these ideals. He admires its laws, which he believes reflect deep wisdom, and its citizens, who he describes as industrious, virtuous, and respectful of their leaders. He acknowledges the clergy for their alignment with civic values and their ability to inspire trust through their personal conduct. He emphasizes the importance of harmony between the clergy and other leaders in maintaining the state’s stability. Rousseau also highlights the contributions of Geneva’s women, whom he credits with preserving societal virtue and fostering unity through their roles in family and community life.
This portrayal of Geneva as a microcosm of republican ideals sets the stage for the Discourse’s exploration of how inequality disrupts harmony by fostering competition, jealousy, and alienation. By emphasizing the role of women in preserving societal virtue, Rousseau hints at the broader social fabric that inequality unravels, as he contends that inequality distorts not only economic and political relations but also the intimate connections that sustain communal life.
Themes
Rousseau hopes for Geneva’s continued prosperity and unity. He urges citizens to remain vigilant against division, respect their magistrates, and preserve the republic’s laws and values. He views Geneva as a model of liberty and governance, rooted in its citizens’ collective wisdom and commitment to their shared ideals.
Rousseau’s call for Geneva to safeguard its unity and preserve its republican values serves as a closing exhortation that ties directly into the Discourse’s central thesis: that the preservation of liberty and equality requires constant vigilance and collective effort. This final appeal encapsulates Rousseau’s belief that inequality is not an inevitable condition but rather a consequence of societal complacency and division.
Themes
