Kurt Vonnegut’s novel Player Piano illustrates the many downsides of technological progress. The protagonist, Paul Proteus, lives in a near future in which American society values technological advancement more than anything else—including actual people. Because the entire country is controlled by machines, physical laborers have been forced out of their jobs. This leads to booming economic growth, but it also strips many people of their livelihood and takes away their sense of purpose in life. As these people feel increasingly devalued and expendable, the elite class of engineers prides itself on making great strides. But these strides are limited, since the corporate world focuses solely on financial and technological growth, ignoring more meaningful things like how machines have impacted people’s lives. By illustrating the toll mechanization has taken on actual human lives, the novel implies that progress (at least in terms of technology) isn’t always a good thing. But when anti-automation revolutionaries finally destroy the machines, they end up immediately trying to rebuild them—an indication that, for better or worse, humans naturally gravitate toward technological invention and discovery.
Automation benefits the corporate world because it’s extremely efficient, eliminating the imperfections of human labor and creating a reliable, streamlined system. In the world of Player Piano, American society has taken this desire for efficiency to the extreme, replacing anyone whose job could be done by a machine. The corporate environment to which Paul belongs sees this as the ultimate form of progress, since machines can create superior products at a lower cost. Human laborers, on the other hand, are messy and unreliable. Before he loses faith in the value of automation, Paul points out that humans are affected by petty things like “hangovers, family squabbles, resentments against the boss, debts,” and virtually “every kind of human trouble”—all of which eventually show up as flaws in the products themselves. It’s therefore most cost effective for Paul’s company to use machines instead of manual laborers, which is why people like Kroner (Paul’s boss) see automation as a tangible form of progress. Machines increase profits and diminish the many challenges of the workplace, so the strides technology has made seem like obvious improvements on modern life.
This kind of technological progress, however, doesn’t actually advance society as a whole. It might allow certain things like the manufacturing industry to function a bit more smoothly, but productivity and financial success aren’t the only measures of an advanced society. To that end, very few people in Paul’s hometown of Ilium are genuinely happy. This is because the laborers who have been forced out of work by machines have lost their “dignity.” As Lasher—a cynical reverend Paul meets in a bar—puts it, a sense of being “needed and useful” in life is the “foundation of self-respect.” Taking jobs away from people thus means robbing them of their self-respect, since it’s difficult for people to feel “needed and useful” when society acts like they’re easily replaceable. With this in mind, it’s hard to argue that any country is particularly advanced if large numbers of its citizens are miserable and lack self-respect.
Along with all this unhappiness, there’s also a terrible rift in society between the corporate elite and the former manual laborers. This division is the direct result of automation, since forcing people out of their jobs is a perfect way to emphasize class disparities, basically drawing a clear line between the fortunate engineers who get to stay in their careers and everyone else. The highest paid person in Ilium, Paul can’t even walk into a bar without feeling everyone’s resentment, since he represents corporate success. This makes it uncomfortably clear that the so-called progress society has made is limited to its technological advancements, which have mainly led to unhappiness and division amongst the social classes.
Because of all the downsides of automation, society is perfectly poised for revolution and class war—a sure sign that all this progress has actually caused more harm than good. Unhappy with his life as a manager, Paul helps lead a group of revolutionaries called the Ghost Shirt Society. One of this group’s most compelling arguments against automation is that human beings are naturally “imperfect” and that, instead of trying to avoid this imperfection, society should embrace it. According to the Ghost Shirts, manufacturing human incompetence out of the workforce isn’t really a form of progress, since it just creates so many other societal problems. And yet, people like Kroner just assume anything that increases production is beneficial to society and thus counts as progress.
Despite the book’s critical attitude toward automation, it also explores the idea that this kind of technological progress is unavoidable. This is apparent when the very same Ghost Shirt revolutionaries who destroy all the machines in Ilium end up excitedly rebuilding them. Although their main goal was to fight against automation in order to live in a machine-free society, it only takes a few hours before they find themselves in a blissful state of creativity as they try to get the broken machines working again. For example, Bud Calhoun—a gifted former engineer—uses scraps of discarded equipment to fix a busted soda machine while a crowd of his fellow Ghost Shirt members watch and applaud his work.
This speaks to an observation Finnerty makes in the aftermath of the failed revolution: “Things don’t stay the way they are,” he says. “It’s too entertaining to change them.” The implication here is that humans are naturally inclined toward progress. Even though people like Bud Calhoun know that machines have had a harmful overall impact on society, he and the other Ghost Shirts still try to rebuild the very things they themselves destroyed. This suggests that technological progress is an inevitable fact of life, since humans will always work toward change—even against their better judgement.
Technology and Progress ThemeTracker
Technology and Progress Quotes in Player Piano
Ilium, New York, is divided into three parts.
In the northwest are the managers and engineers and civil servants and a few professional people; in the northeast are the machines; and in the south, across the Iroquois River, is the area known locally as Homestead, where almost all of the people live.
If the bridge across the Iroquois were dynamited, few daily routines would be disturbed. Not many people on either side have reasons other than curiosity for crossing.
During the war in hundreds of Iliums over America, managers and engineers learned to get along without their men and women, who went to fight. It was the miracle that won the war—production with almost no manpower. In the patois of the north side of the river, it was the know-how that won the war. Democracy owed its life to know-how.
Where men had once howled and hacked at one another, and fought nip-and-tuck with nature as well, the machines hummed and whirred and clicked, and made parts for baby carriages and bottle caps, motorcycles and refrigerators, television sets and tricycles—the fruits of peace.
Paul sometimes wondered if he wouldn’t have been more content in another period of history, but the rightness of Bud’s being alive now was beyond question. Bud’s mentality was one that had been remarked upon as being peculiarly American since the nation had been born—the restless, erratic insight and imagination of a gadgeteer. This was the climax, or close to it, of generations of Bud Calhouns, with almost all of American industry integrated into one stupendous Rube Goldberg machine.
“It seemed very fresh to me—I mean that part where you say how the First Industrial Revolution devalued muscle work, then the second one devalued routine mental work. I was fascinated.”
[…]
“Actually, it is kind of incredible that things were ever any other way, isn’t it? It was so ridiculous to have people stuck in one place all day, just using their senses, then a reflex, using their senses, then a reflex, and not really thinking at all.”
“[…] Hangovers, family squabbles, resentments against the boss, debts, the war—every kind of human trouble was likely to show up in a product one way or another.” He smiled. “And happiness, too. I can remember when we had to allow for holidays, especially around Christmas. There wasn’t anything to do but take it. The reject rate would start climbing around the fifth of December, and up and up it’d go until Christmas. Then the holiday, then a horrible reject rate; then New Year’s, then a ghastly reject level. Then things would taper down to normal—which was plenty bad enough—by January fifteenth or so. We used to have to figure in things like that in pricing a product.”
“[…] we’ve raised the standard of living of the average man immensely.”
Khashdrahr stopped translating and frowned perplexedly. “Please, this average man, there is no equivalent in our language, I’m afraid.”
“You know,” said Halyard, “the ordinary man, like, well, anybody—those men working back on the bridge, the man in that old car we passed. The little man, not brilliant but a good-hearted, plain, ordinary, everyday kind of person.”
Khashdrahr translated.
“Aha,” said the Shah, nodding, “Takaru.”
“What did he say?”
“Takaru,” said Khashdrahr. “Slave.”
“No Takaru,” said Halyard, speaking directly to the Shah. “Ci-ti-zen.”
“Ahhhhh,” said the Shah. “Ci-ti-zen.” He grinned happily. “Takaru—citizen. Citizen—Takaru.”
“No Takaru!” said Halyard.
Khashdrahr shrugged. “In the Shah’s land are only the Elite and the Takaru.”
“[…] The Atomic Age, that was the big thing to look forward to. Remember, Baer? And meanwhile, the tubes increased like rabbits.”
“And dope addiction, alcoholism, and suicide went up proportionately,” said Finnerty.
[…]
“That was the war,” said Kroner soberly. “It happens after every war.”
“And organized vice and divorce and juvenile delinquency, all parallel the growth of the use of vacuum tubes,” said Finnerty.
“Oh, come on, Ed,” said Paul, “you can’t prove a logical connection between those factors.”
“If there's the slightest connection, it’s worth thinking about,” said Finnerty.
When Paul thought about his effortless rise in the hierarchy, he sometimes, as now, felt sheepish, like a charlatan. He could handle his assignments all right, but he didn’t have what his father had, what Kroner had, what Shepherd had, what so many had: the sense of spiritual importance in what they were doing; the ability to be moved emotionally, almost like a lover, by the great omnipresent and omniscient spook, the corporate personality. In short, Paul missed what made his father aggressive and great: the capacity to really give a damn.
“Ah haven’t got a job any more,” said Bud. “Canned.”
Paul was amazed. “Really? What on earth for? Moral turpitude? What about the gadget you invented for—"
“Thet’s it,” said Bud with an eerie mixture of pride and remorse. “Works. Does a fine job.” He smiled sheepishly. “Does it a whole lot better than Ah did it.”
“It runs the whole operation?”
“Yup. Some gadget.”
“And so you’re out of a job.”
“Seventy-two of us are out of jobs,” said Bud.
“It’s the loneliness,” he said, as though picking up the thread of a conversation that had been interrupted. “It’s the loneliness, the not belonging anywhere. I just about went crazy with loneliness here in the old days, and I figured things would be better in Washington, that I’d find a lot of people I admired and be- longed with. Washington is worse, Paul—Ilium to the tenth power. Stupid, arrogant, self-congratulatory, unimaginative, humorless men. [...]”
“[…] When I had a congregation before the war, I used to tell them that the life of their spirit in relation to God was the biggest thing in their lives, and that their part in the economy was nothing by comparison. Now, you people have engineered them out of their part in the economy, in the market place, and they’re finding out—most of them—that what’s left is just about zero. A good bit short of enough, anyway. […]”
Kroner looked at him with surprise. “Look, you know darn good and well history’s answered the question a thousand times.”
“It has? Has it? You know; I wouldn’t. Answered it a thousand times, has it? That’s good, good. All I know is, you’ve got to act like it has, or you might as well throw in the towel. Don’t know, my boy. Guess I should, but I don’t. Just do my job. Maybe that’s wrong.”
“What am I going to do? Farm, maybe. I’ve got a nice little farm.”
“Farm, eh?” Harrison clucked his tongue reflectively. “Farm. Sounds wonderful. I’ve thought of that: up in the morning with the sun; working out there with your hands in the earth, just you and nature. If I had the money, sometimes I think maybe I’d throw this—”
“You want a piece of advice from a tired old man?”
“Depends on which tired old man. You?”
“Me. Don’t put one foot in your job and the other in your dreams, Ed. Go ahead and quit, or resign yourself to this life. It’s just too much of a temptation for fate to split you right up the middle before you’ve made up your mind which way to go.”
“What have you got against machines?” said Buck.
“They’re slaves.”
“Well, what the heck,” said Buck. “I mean, they aren’t people. They don’t suffer. They don’t mind working.”
“No. But they compete with people.”
“That’s a pretty good thing, isn’t it—considering what a sloppy job most people do of anything?”
“Anything that competes with slaves becomes a slave,” said Harrison thickly, and he left.
“Men, by their nature, seemingly, cannot be happy unless engaged in enterprises that make them feel useful. They must, therefore, be returned to participation in such enterprises.
“I hold, and the members of the Ghost Shirt Society hold:
“That there must be virtue in imperfection, for Man is imperfect, and Man is a creation of God.
“That there must be virtue in frailty, for Man is frail, and Man is a creation of God.
“That there must be virtue in inefficiency, for Man is inefficient, and Man is a creation of God.
“That there must be virtue in brilliance followed by stupidity, for Man is alternately brilliant and stupid, and Man is a creation of God. […]”
“What distinguishes man from the rest of the animals is his ability to do artificial things,” said Paul. “To his greater glory, I say. And a step backward, after making a wrong turn, is a step in the right direction.”
“You know,” said Paul at last, “things wouldn’t have been so bad if they’d stayed the way they were when we first got here. Those were passable days, weren’t they?” […]
“Things don’t stay the way they are,” said Finnerty. “It’s too entertaining to try to change them.”